Evaluación de los materiales de obturación en tratamientos pulpares. Revisión Sistemática

Translated title of the contribution: Evaluation of filling materials in pulp treatments. Systematic review.

Marisel Roxana Valenzuela Ramos, M. L. Bermeo Flores, W. Terrones Campos, N. O. Gonzales-Aedo, G. R. Huamán-Espinoza, P. M. Dias Monteiro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the clinical and radiographic success in pulpectomized primary teeth using zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE), Metapex and Endoflas at 6 and 12 months. Material and Methods: The search was carried out in the following databases: Scopus, Pubmed, Science Direct and Cochrane, obtaining a total of 1440 articles collected. Results: 7 articles are included because they comply with the use of Endoflas, Mextafex and ZOE, of the-se 7 articles it is decided to select only 5 articles since we want to compare the clinical and radiographic successes using ZOE, METAPLEX OR ENDOFLAS, and the others. 2 are decided to be left out due to not containing complete information that we needed for our research. Conclusions: ZOE and ENDOFLAS showed greater clinical and radiographic effectiveness.

Translated title of the contributionEvaluation of filling materials in pulp treatments. Systematic review.
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)27-37
Number of pages11
JournalAvances en Odontoestomatologia
Volume40
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2024
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024, Ediciones Avances S.L.. All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of filling materials in pulp treatments. Systematic review.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this